Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6?
On 2007-02-28 09:47:07 +0000, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Just a very stupid idea: why not play with asciidoc a little? It should
> do all what we want, we could finally simplify makedoc a lot and still
> get all output we want. Plus: the manual would be much easier to hack
> on, much smaller in size, etc. With some XSLT magic I think it could be
> more or less easy to create an initial asciidoc-based document.
I've always disliked wiki-like formats. They are not robust enough.
DocBook, as being XML, allows transformations much more easily (e.g.
with XSLT), has a useful validation mechanism and more semantics.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)