Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6?
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:45:08PM +0000, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> I once started some really simple and early work for a simple pluggable
> mailbox driver system. Once done, it could be easily extended to allow
> for any type of filter (compressed folder) and to allow for more mailbox
> drivers implementing the interface (NNTP). But this is quite difficult
> and long way to go since the code is so closely coupled already... :(
Does this mean what I think it means? Say I wanted to have my mailbox
as a sqlite db. Would that fit into this pluggable system? Why not
create a branch now and let some folks at it!?
--
:: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies
:: e-Dialog | jmacdonald@xxxxxxxxxxxx
:: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421
:: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118
:: www.e-dialog.com