<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: What's needed for mutt 1.6? (Debian patches)



Hi,

* Brendan Cully [07-02-23 23:10:57 -0800] wrote:

It doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. But can someone remind me what
the objections were to the compressed-folder patch?

I don't really like the implementation because it enforces mbox. It would be much nicer (and have a much better design) if it could just uncompress the file and let mutt itself decide what to do with it.

  bye, Rocco
--
:wq!