Re: [RFC] header cache type "safety"

To: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] header cache type "safety"
From: Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:06:40 +0200
Cc: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20060507141213.GG77843@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt Developers <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20060505111652.GE2757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060505135318.GE37739@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060506070933.GL2757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060506074816.GF26801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060506150626.GP2757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060507090158.GA3502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060507093915.GA8522@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060507100027.GB3502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060507113117.GB8522@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060507141213.GG77843@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hello Thomas,

* Rocco Rutte <pdmef@xxxxxxx> [060507 16:33]:
> ACK. I've fixed that (including some name clashes since I fixed some 
> other static functions which used 'db' internally).

would you please commit the following patch to the current CVS?

http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~pdmef/mutt/patches/pdmef+patch+hcache.diff

Thanks,
        Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] header cache type "safety"
  - From: Rocco Rutte

References:
- Re: [RFC] header+body caching for POP
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)
  - From: Rocco Rutte
- Re: [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- Re: [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- Re: [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)
  - From: Rocco Rutte
- Re: [RFC] header caching for MH (was: [RFC] header+body caching for POP)
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- [RFC] header cache type "safety" (was: [RFC] header caching for MH)
  - From: Rocco Rutte
- Re: [RFC] header cache type "safety" (was: [RFC] header caching for MH)
  - From: Thomas Glanzmann
- Re: [RFC] header cache type "safety"
  - From: Rocco Rutte

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] header cache type "safety"
Next by Date: Re: mutt/2194: mutt hanging in endless loop
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] header cache type "safety"
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] header cache type "safety"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread