Re: mutt development status
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:16:42PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Jul 12, John J. Foster [Mutt-Dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:24:46AM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > > 1. mutt is a pretty good mailreader.
> >
> > Agreed 100%. But, others are gaining. That's why people are concerned,
> > and voicing their opinions.
>
> What does "gaining" mean? Mutt's never been about having the most users,
> just about being the least-sucky mail client for people that need a "power
> user" cli mailer. If that's lots of people, fine, but don't phrase it as a
> competition, because it isn't.
Perhaps poor wording on my part, as it definitely wasn't intended the way you
interpreted it.
>
> That said, I don't think mutt is particularly "done" either, and I prefer
> active development as much as anyone else.
--
The revolution will not be televised.