On Jul 12, John J. Foster [Mutt-Dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:24:46AM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > > 1. mutt is a pretty good mailreader. > > Agreed 100%. But, others are gaining. That's why people are concerned, > and voicing their opinions. What does "gaining" mean? Mutt's never been about having the most users, just about being the least-sucky mail client for people that need a "power user" cli mailer. If that's lots of people, fine, but don't phrase it as a competition, because it isn't. That said, I don't think mutt is particularly "done" either, and I prefer active development as much as anyone else.
Attachment:
pgpD9VzBArUdE.pgp
Description: PGP signature