Re: mutt configuration: problem with getting mail
- To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: mutt configuration: problem with getting mail
- From: "Breen Mullins" <breen.mullins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:01:20 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZZiOr/fNq9pAyzCMDIw63vs6PfYJfcOQvqqdcrdYhqc=; b=hcs4bNx5HWgtUe8Dxb/PkQjuEEwdaIlR0GbAFZVJl6V1oA4x114ieJ0ZlJMol3E6lEuc8frj900zmPw7OeI6VJNZVZVKzZXjs7+2tQjPOecyCJzD7mm4KiF3HWIqAPQGmoxqtAdp1GTWFTbg3T0JQm4X0OChjxRZyg9mKoEPKek=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k9XzbbtrLC841qe4x+jkBAZhD4Xrb5rfnRlVJssLlmAPuHNVNuodacizjcEcZUlVioL5Jny5DIPxfcGKNP+yVSJcS84LLo74y/vMt6ZQ2ZJ2WEERaNDlgY5Jyj+iNAE5T8dkgcPrm1xctlxaM5Z4/ghBPrS+Q729VNS8O4X6PTc=
- In-reply-to: <20070911175822.GA5944@localhost>
- List-post: <mailto:mutt-users@mutt.org>
- List-unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@mutt.org, body only "unsubscribe mutt-users"
- References: <45658.10.128.10.14.1189531127.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <57669.10.128.10.14.1189531473.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070911175822.GA5944@localhost>
- Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
On 9/11/07, Kumar Appaiah <akumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think getmail marks messages as read once you receive them. In fact,
> it may so have happened that of your 582 messages, only 417 were new
> (unread), but getmail's claim to have delivered everything beats me.
The OP's getmailrc calls procmail. Does .procmailrc contain the
standard recipe for deleting duplicates?
Checking that (and your procmail log, if you're using one) will be helpful.
Breen
--
Breen Mullins
Menlo Park, Calif.