On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:46:35AM +0100, Lars Bjarby wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 08:14:54AM +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>> Pictures say more than a 1000 words, so I have taken some screenshots to
>> show what I mean:
>>
>
>I'm feeling a tad bit stupid here, but I don't really get which of the
>spams that's garbling the index. Are you refering to all the non-ascii
>chars?
Ah, sorry. Yes, it's the emails with all the non-ascii chars that cause
it.
>(On a side note I generally tend to recommend people to use
>Spamassassin with Razor activated. I recieve between 50 and 200 spams a
>day and about 2-3 a month slip through the filter. I can't remember
>when I had a message flagged as spam when it was not. Usually I Grep
>through the subject-lines in the new-spam-dir once a week or so. But
>maybe you don't have the possibility to run it, or maybe you are
>already running some kind of other filter?)
I am using SpamOracle and it correctly labels the mail as spam, but once
in a while I go through my spambox just to make sure no false positives
are in there. This is when I have the problem.
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://magnus.therning.org/
Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.
Certum est, quia impossibile.
(It is certain, because it is impossible.)
-- Tertullianus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature