<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: mutt writes Fcc: even if the MTA fails to deliver



Am 2004-08-11 22:55:57, schrieb Nicolas Rachinsky:

> I think you should use a better MTA. One which does queuing, for
> example.

Not posibel somtimes...

And why install "sendmail", "exim", "postfix" or "courier-mta" 
if I do not need the perfomance (they are 100 times overkill)

> If my MTA fails to take the mail from mutt, it's (almost) always a
> permanent error.

??? 

> > Already tried to open a mailbox of 10.000 or more messages several 
> > times a day ? 
> 
> Yes, no problem. But you don't want to tell us, that you retry mail
> submission that often.

If I am waiting 4 weeks to cleanup the arcive I must search a little 
bit to much... And, if I mack seaches in the Archives, I get false 
resultats. So I must cleanup the Archive immediatly.


> Nicolas

Greetings
Michelle

-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ 
Michelle Konzack   Apt. 917                  ICQ #328449886
                   50, rue de Soultz         MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356    67100 Strasbourg/France   IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature