2004-07-28 16:20, frank@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote in
<20040728142022.GA26762@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> As long as i understand strftime(3) correctly (on which date_format
> is depending), there's no way to do what you need within mutt.
strftime(3) also has no concept of the various alternatives for
timestamps that are already available through %<>, %[], %{} etc.
From the silence, it certainly sounds like I'd have to dig into the
source to accomplish this. I'll see if I get around to it (I have a
LOT of things to do these days), and if I end up with something
workable I will submit a patch.
--
/"\ Michael Kjörling - michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx - SM0YBY QTH JO89XI ^..^
\ / OpenPGP: 3723 9372 c245 d6a8 18a6 36ac 758f 8749 BDE9 ADA6 \/
X World Wide Web: http://michael.kjorling.com/ Facta non verba
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML Mail, Proprietary Attachments
Attachment:
pgp0fEhUSCQ9U.pgp
Description: PGP signature