On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:04:00PM EDT, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-05-28 14:29 > -0400]: > > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 09:32:37AM EDT, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > > Hmm, I have some lines like this in my .muttrc, and they all seem to > > > work fine: > > > color body brightblue default "[-a-z_0-9.+]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+" > > > > > > I'm using: > > > Mutt 1.5.6i (2004-02-01) > > > > Man, that sucks. The newest version (at least) supports 1.4.x behavior > > again. That's one less advantage to my own setup :-( > > IIRC this worked all the time here. Hmm ... Google isn't being my friend today, so I can't find the original discussion off-hand :-( > > Can you try something like this just to be sure? (The regex was imported > > from Perl, so feel free to change whatever's necessary to fix it.) > > > > color body red default > > '((http|https|ftp|gopher|finger):\/\/(.+?))(?="|\s|>|\))' > > Hmm, my mutt doesn't accept +? and (?=. But my (not very good) url > regexp works fine for (many) URLs which are only a part of a line. > color body brightblue default "((ftp|https?)://|(ftp|www[-a-z0-9]*)\\.)[^ > \t\r\n\"<>]*[^].,:;!)? \t\r\n<>\"]" > > I'm too lazy to think about how to convert your regexp to something my > mutt accepts, and I'm too lazy to find (or produce) a test case. How about something like this? color body red default "a" Will that color only the "a"s in a message and nothing else? Thanks, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgp4YOTdhXHxg.pgp
Description: PGP signature