Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
From: Aron Griffis <agriffis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 13:04:16 -0400
In-reply-to: <20040517174518.GA18823@gloaming>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Aron Griffis <agriffis@xxxxxxxxxx>, mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <20040511165447.GA22580@gloaming> <20040515100603.GB26968@xxxxxxxxx> <20040515213420.GB9664@gloaming> <20040516022114.GA12596@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20040517174518.GA18823@gloaming>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

Daniel Teichert wrote:[Mon May 17 2004, 01:45:18PM EDT]
> GNU gdb 6.1-debian

Looks like a good backtrace, albeit with a lot of stripped libraries.
Since you're running Debian, you might consider posting this as a bug
(including the debugging information) to Debian's bug tracking system
before pursuing it as an upstream bug.

Aron

References:
- Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
  - From: Daniel Teichert
- Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
  - From: Alain Bench
- Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
  - From: Daniel Teichert
- Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
  - From: David Champion
- Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
  - From: Daniel Teichert

Prev by Date: Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
Next by Date: Re: sent messages
Previous by thread: Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
Next by thread: Re: Mutt segfaulting with certain index_format/spam combos
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread