<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

strange list-reply behavior [was: Re: Strip SIG on reply]



# lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx / 2004-01-11 18:11:52 -0500:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:50:38PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >     I've been always somwhat unsure about the exact way list-reply
> >     works, and today I had an "accident" that a) makes a good example,
> >     and b) is perhaps what you are wondering about.
> > 
> >     I sent a message to freebsd-hackers@, which I'm 'subscribe'd to,
> >     using list-reply. The message I was following up on had these
> >     headers:
> > 
> >     From: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     To: freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >     Message-ID: <20040109003630.GA63979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <20040107200838.GD86935@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <20040108071730.GA53328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <20040108173642.GS54743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     In-Reply-To: <20040108173642.GS54743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
> >     Precedence: list
> 
> It didn't have any MFT header?
 
    it didn't.

> >     my list-reply:
> > 
> >     From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     To: Kris Kennaway <kris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Message-ID: <20040109095246.GT54743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <20040107200838.GD86935@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <20040108071730.GA53328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <20040108173642.GS54743@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >             <20040109003630.GA63979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     In-Reply-To: <20040109003630.GA63979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
> >     Cc: freebsd-hackers@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >     Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> That's really weird if there was no MFT in the original.
> 
> >     Could someone tell me why mutt did this, and describe the exact
> >     rules list-reply follows?
> 
> If there was no MFT header in the original, I'm at a loss to explain
> any of what happened above.

    welcome onboard. :)

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html