On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:29:41AM -0600, Eugene Lee wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 07:53:18PM -0500, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > : > : On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:19:56PM +0100, René Clerc wrote: > : > : > * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [02-12-2003 > 12:16]: > : > > : > > What's a reply-hook? I can't find it anywhere :-( > : > > : > Read the manual. > : > : http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.4 > : > : That area lists nothing called a reply-hook. Would somebody care to point > : me to the section in the manual that mentions reply-hook? I _still_ > : can't find it anywhere (and the manual isn't a single web page, making > : it difficult to search). > > René Clerc is in the wrong. The reply-hook is new as of Mutt 1.5.x. > But as you see from Mutt's Linux-kernel-numbering scheme, the 1.5.x > series is development-only and is not a release version. Personally, > I'm running Mutt 1.5.5i and it works well enough for me. /me points to his own "User-Agent:" header, sticking his toungue out - "I've got a newer Mutt! I've got a newer Mutt! Ha ha, ha ha, I've got a newer Mutt. . ." ;-P Now, has anybody found a manual for the development-only branch, by any chance??? - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpl24SRNYJem.pgp
Description: PGP signature