G'day David, *Laughing* Breaking my own rule almost immediately! * David Yitzchak Cohen <lists+mutt_users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [031205 10:22]: > IMHO, people who want to stick to the topic should simply delete (or > toss from procmailrc) OT messages without having to read them. This is I like that. Never even crossed my mind... /dev/null all message with [OT] in the title. Nice. > The primary advantage of maintaining threads that go OT is that they > tend to come back on-topic in a totally different place with a brand > new perspective on something fundamental; As evidenced here... Oh, and related to the "Header Madness"(?) thread from before, there is a small(ish) thread on gnupg-users about what is the appropriate naming for GPG/Open-PGP detail headers. I used your umpteen X-GPG.... headers as an example. Politely of course. :) Well, I'm shutting up again and trying to get some work done. Cheers, S.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature