Hi all :)
En ce beau mercredi 10 septembre, à 04 heures 21, David T-G a raconté :
(Sorry, I'm french, and I didn't told mutt that you speak english yet..)
David> Mike --
David>
David> ...and then Mike Arrison said...
David> %
David> % On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 07:20:13PM +0200, Hugues wrote:
David> % > ________________
David> % > rewrite_subject 1
David> % > subject_tag [SPAM] _HITS_ Pts;
David> % That looks pretty good, but I would prefer it in a separate header.
David>
David> Agreed :-)
I totally agree, because :
1. I do not really like SA changing my headers
2. It is not a *real* solution, neither a clean one
BUT..
this workarounds helps me.
However... :
David> % What if I got the header to look like:
David> %
David> % X-MyScore: 2.6
David>
David> If you can do that, then use X-Label: instead.
..exactly, I totally forgot the existence of this only
mutt-index-printable header with the "%Y" string in the index format string.
So, with procmail, I can rewrite my headers in order to obtain such an
"X-Label:" based on the "X-Spam-*" fields from SpamAssassin, and then
make mutt displaying it for me.
But i retain the possibility from SA to alter the Subject with a
"[SPAM]" key string, that is really quickly readable ;)
David> % mail, it parses up all the headers, I'm really just wondering if the
David> % none standard headers end up in a usable variable.
David>
David> Basically no, but X-Label: is a standard non-standard header ;-)
Totally agree ! :o)
It would be very great if we could do such things with _any_ header...
;)
Good, now I have to rewrite my ~/.spamassassin/users_prefs,
~/.procmailrc and ~/.muttrc files ;) Gosh.. I only I had more time.. ;)
--
Hugues
_______________________________________________________________
GnuPG NEW!fINGERpRINT 5c9148c69895d231632e 6f23c03bdfd21533658c
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
Attachment:
pgpu9UGOiRfm0.pgp
Description: PGP signature