Re: UI enhancements

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: UI enhancements
From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:05:10 +0200
In-reply-to: <20070905184041.GF26834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20070831154005.GA16397@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070831185240.GH26267@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070901095856.GA4190@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070903064446.GA303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070904183725.GB5857@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070905075601.GA16604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070905184041.GF26834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-09-05)

On 2007-09-05 11:40:41 -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:

> yes, I agree very much with this. That's why the emacs input
> method seems more suitable - mutt's input line is a lot like the
> emacs minibuffer.

+1

-- 
Thomas Roessler   <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- UI enhancements
  - From: Rocco Rutte
- Re: UI enhancements
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: UI enhancements
  - From: Marco d'Itri
- Re: UI enhancements
  - From: Rocco Rutte
- Re: UI enhancements
  - From: Brendan Cully
- Re: UI enhancements
  - From: Rocco Rutte
- Re: UI enhancements
  - From: Brendan Cully

Prev by Date: Re: [Mutt] #2882: segfaults in uxterm with > 254 columns if there
Next by Date: bloat alert: include_onlyfirst
Previous by thread: Re: UI enhancements
Next by thread: Re: UI enhancements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread