Re: header_cache broken in cvs
On Monday, 13 March 2006 at 18:05, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Brendan Cully wrote: [Mon Mar 13 2006, 05:17:38PM EST]
> > thanks. It appears that your courier IMAP server isn't supplying a
> > UIDNEXT value on SELECT. This violates RFC 3501 (section 6.3.1), so
>
> Interesting! Some googling bears this out...
>
> http://dave.cridland.net/acap/polymer.html
> http://www.viraj.org/imap_calendar_proxy/CHANGES
>
> > I'm not 100% convinced mutt should work around it, but give this
> > patch a try...
>
> Thanks, the patch does the trick. Considering the prevalence of
> courier-imap, IMHO mutt should work around the problem. All three of
> the my IMAP servers use it, and I don't have privs on any of those
> boxes. Even if courier gets fixed, it's going to be a while before
> it's deployed everywhere.
Thanks for testing - I've just committed the patch. It doesn't really
have any drawbacks, so it'd just be pedantic not to apply it :)