Re: header_cache broken in cvs
Brendan Cully wrote: [Mon Mar 13 2006, 05:17:38PM EST]
> thanks. It appears that your courier IMAP server isn't supplying a
> UIDNEXT value on SELECT. This violates RFC 3501 (section 6.3.1), so
Interesting! Some googling bears this out...
http://dave.cridland.net/acap/polymer.html
http://www.viraj.org/imap_calendar_proxy/CHANGES
> I'm not 100% convinced mutt should work around it, but give this
> patch a try...
Thanks, the patch does the trick. Considering the prevalence of
courier-imap, IMHO mutt should work around the problem. All three of
the my IMAP servers use it, and I don't have privs on any of those
boxes. Even if courier gets fixed, it's going to be a while before
it's deployed everywhere.
I took a cursory glance at the courier imapd sources; nothing jumps
out but I haven't spent any real time on it yet. I do see that other
people have noticed the same problem, though:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=185041
Aron