Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:24:55 +0100
In-reply-to: <20060115214141.GG29480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
References: <20060115193922.GA17110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060115201545.GA58031@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060115201808.GA66765@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m3vewli3go.fsf_-_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060115214141.GG29480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Thomas Roessler schrieb am 2006-01-15:

> Well, you can actually put an "Attach" pseudoheader into your
> message while you compose it, if you have header editing turned
> on.  Mutt will attach the file that's identified there.

Great, that's good enough.

Does anyhone happen to have some vim magic to do...

> With the mail-mode that I'm using with jed, I can actually type
> C-c a and then use jed's file selection mechanism to select the
> attachment for mutt.

...this?

-- 
Matthias Andree

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
  - From: Gary Johnson
- Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
  - From: Cameron Simpson

References:
- tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
  - From: Phil Pennock
- Re: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
  - From: Nicolas Rachinsky
- Re: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
  - From: Nicolas Rachinsky
- Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
  - From: Matthias Andree
- Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
  - From: Thomas Roessler

Prev by Date: Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
Next by Date: Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
Previous by thread: Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
Next by thread: Re: Feature request: missing attachment (was: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread