Re: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros

To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
From: Nicolas Rachinsky <mutt-devel-0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:15:45 +0100
In-reply-to: <20060115193922.GA17110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
References: <20060115193922.GA17110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

* Phil Pennock <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-01-15 20:39 +0100]:
> Mr Rachinsky asked about tag-prefixing macros; I decided that what was
> needed was <tag-push> and <tag-pop> and that this would be a good way to
> explore more of mutt's code.

Wow, thanks. I've written a similar patch, too. My patch is not really
tested, and I'm quite unhappy how I named everything. I'm not sure if
push and pop are good names, probably better than mine, but I think
they are a bit misleading.

Now I have to decide which patch I should test. :)

Thanks again,
Nicolas

-- 
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
  - From: Nicolas Rachinsky

References:
- tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
  - From: Phil Pennock

Prev by Date: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
Next by Date: Re: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
Previous by thread: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
Next by thread: Re: tag-push and tag-pop for tag-prefixing macros
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread