Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))

To: Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu <ttakah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:31:13 +0900
In-reply-to: <20050131114229.GA32089@xxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050126115002.GH4589@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050126135413.GA21617@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050126145119.GD73404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050126151329.GC22506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050126161222.GF73404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128212631.GB5695@xxxxxxx> <20050128235013.GA43925@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050129205745.GA11190@xxxxxxx> <20050129235618.GA46224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050131114229.GA32089@xxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:59:10 +0100 (CET)
Resent-from: Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <20051113145910.GA29775@xxxxxxx>
Resent-to: Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:42:30PM +0100, Alain Bench wrote:

>     The fix for Vincent *seems* nearly OK: Whatever setting, C case is
> converted at best, and unconvertables are correctly ?-masked. But... Not
> in $assumed_charset=us-ascii default setting: A and B are correctly
> masked, C is pass-thru. Ideally C should be masked as A and B.
> 
>     And there probably should be a legacy mode where A is masked, and B
> and C are pass-thru. Reintroduce $strict_mime bolean? No: Better when
> $assumed_charset is unset or has an empty component. And probably legacy
> mode should be default.
> 
>     The meaning of "us-ascii" should be "us-ascii", not a special case
> trigger. Evil in-band signalling and such.

Thank you for the thorough audit.

If you are in a hurry, please see
http://www.momonga-linux.org/~tamo/patch-1.5.7.tt+tamo.short_assumed_file_charset.2

I haven't tried it out.
I'll do it tomorrow, because I am drunk tonight.

-- 
tamo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
  - From: Alain Bench
- Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu

References:
- What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Thomas Roessler
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Charles Cazabon
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Charles Cazabon
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?)
  - From: Alain Bench
- Re: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?)
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?)
  - From: Alain Bench
- Re: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?)
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
  - From: Alain Bench

Prev by Date: Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
Next by Date: Re: mutt-users
Previous by thread: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
Next by thread: Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread