Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))

To: Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
From: Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:03:42 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <20050131143113.GA50019@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@mutt.org?Subject="Unsubscribe Mutt Dev"?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050126135413.GA21617@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050126145119.GD73404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050126151329.GC22506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050126161222.GF73404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050128212631.GB5695@xxxxxxx> <20050128235013.GA43925@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050129205745.GA11190@xxxxxxx> <20050129235618.GA46224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050131114229.GA32089@xxxxxxx> <20050131143113.GA50019@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:59:10 +0100 (CET)
Resent-from: Alain Bench <veronatif@xxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <20051113145910.GB29775@xxxxxxx>
Resent-to: Mutt dev ml <mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i-ja.1

 On Monday, January 31, 2005 at 11:31:13 PM +0900, Tamotsu Takahashi wrote:

> Thank you for the thorough audit.

    You're welcome!


> If you are in a hurry, please see
> http://www.momonga-linux.org/~tamo/patch-1.5.7.tt+tamo.short_assumed_file_charset.2

    Quick check gives legacy perfect, Vincent mode perfect, my everyday
settings OK. Bravo, well done. Still have to study masking on UTF-8:
Seems to be a "?" or U+FFFD masking char minor inconsistency.


| Forwarding. (Providing against delivery failure.)

    Thanks for the forward, your post didn't reach the list so far.


Bye!    Alain.
-- 
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
<URL:http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu

References:
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Charles Cazabon
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: Charles Cazabon
- Re: What should go into 1.5.7?
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?)
  - From: Alain Bench
- Re: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?)
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- Re: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?)
  - From: Alain Bench
- Re: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?)
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu
- short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
  - From: Alain Bench
- Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
  - From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu

Prev by Date: Mail-followup-to oddity
Next by Date: Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
Previous by thread: Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
Next by thread: Re: short assumed (was: alternates (was: What should go into 1.5.7?))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread