Re: group-reply - bug or feature?
* Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [Sep 20. 2005 12:01]:
> > Whether the original To header goes into a reply's To or CC
> > header. Current behavior is CC, behavior desired by some is To.
> > I don't really care, but I'm used to the current behavior.
>
> ... and I don't want to get into a pattern where we change it back
> and forth every time someone complains and recruits sufficient
> support on mutt-dev or mutt-users ...
So as we clearly see, there's about 50/50 percent for both ways. Why is
it so bad making it a configure option then? The SUSE mutt package have
had that for a long time.
--
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
-- A. P. J.