<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: another silly question



On 2005-05-09 00:58:20 +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 01:42:41AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > No, base64 is really bad for that. QP is probably much better. But
> > anyway, most mail software (MUA or MDA) won't choose an
> > alternative encoding magically.
> 
> MDA software should not be changing the format of the mail it's delivering.
> Its job is purely to put the mail into the mailbox, nothing else.

In this case, choosing an alternate encoding is not a solution
to consider, as the sender of the mail doesn't necessarily know
what mailbox format the recipient uses, in particular when most
senders use MS-Windows.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA