Re: another silly question
On 2005-05-03 13:18:52 -0500, David Champion wrote:
> That's not quite right. Mbox has often been recommended, just not as
> a one-step solution to the same set of problems. Each format has
> strengths, and each has weaknesses. I use both, I like using both,
> and I think mbox is the best default for any UNIX mailer that aims
> to be broadly usable.
Why would this make Mutt more broadly usable?
I think it would be the opposite, as maildir works anywhere, contrary
to mbox, which has problems on NFS.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA