For 1.5.9: (Re: POTFILES.in update)
Subject: For 1.5.9: (Re: POTFILES.in update)
I suggest the changes[0] to POTFILES.in and other files,
because no one has replied to this message:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 12:06:18PM +0900, Tamotsu Takahashi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 02:10:30PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu in <20050218124658.GB14700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > - state_attach_puts ("*** Begin Notation (signature by: ", s);
> > > + state_attach_puts (_("*** Begin Notation (signature by: "), s);
> >
> > Is this a free form text or defined format that should not be
> > changed/translated?
>
> I think it can be translated.
<snip>
> > > - fprintf (fp, "Internal error: can't create gpgme context: %s\n",
> > > + fprintf (fp, _("Internal error: can't create gpgme context: %s\n"),
> >
> > Is it worthwhile to translate internal errors? If it's something that
> > users can be expected to see, should the "Internal error" be dropped
> > from the error message?
>
> Reading this message, a user will know that the error is
> not his fault but developers' fault (of either mutt or gpgme).
> So, "Internal error" is valid IMHO.
--
tamo
0: Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:46:58 +0900
From: TAKAHASHI Tamotsu <ttakah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: POTFILES.in update
Message-ID: <20050218124658.GB14700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>