Re: Alain Bench in <20050129112435.GB8765@xxxxxxx> > Basic and single whitelisting is not efficient IMHO. I remember > receiving spam by *you*, and recently received (real) bounces from > trithemius, for viruses I sent. I had hoped that this case would be not so common. > > * I can setup a debbugs BTS with the above. > > * Or we use Werner's bugzilla. > > Votes/comments on that? (I'm voting for debbugs+whitelisting.) > > Debbugs has only 2 problems: Spam sensibility, and ugly > encapsulation of mails to "-done" (happily circumventable by "close" > control directive). I played around with debbugs during the last days. The current package is several years old, and noone of the developers seems to be inclined to pack CVS head into a new one. I don't want to have to pick single patches from the BTS there. Furthermore, the built-in spam processing is only available in CVS head, but broke with recent Spamassassin versions. The bottom line is that I suggest accepting Werner's offer to use his bugzilla setup. Werner, Thomas: please tell me what kind of help you could use in the transition. Christoph -- cb@xxxxxxxx | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature