Re: Mutt Next Generation
On 2005-01-27 12:32:39 -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> My understanding is that the cache has been built to take care
> not to require locking on the maildir.
There is no disagreement on this.
> There is a lock on the cache,
Precisely.
> but if something goes wrong with that, mutt just falls back to
> direct access to the maildir.
What if something goes wrong in a way that's not detected? That's
precisely the issue with non-working locking.
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.