On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > Personally, I don't think mutt should include either an NNTP or an > SMTP client (but maybe I'm old-fashioned). I can see the argument against SMTP. I personally never use Usenet, but to me, NNTP and e-mail seem like (from the perspective of the user) exactly the same thing, so I see no reason why mutt shouldn't do both. Both involve the sending and receiving of messages, and the nature and construction of those messages are essentially identical. The only difference is on the back end, which is not at all of concern to the user. What is of concern is having a uniform interface to those things which are done the same way. I think mutt needs NNTP support. > And I'm skeptic about header-caching maildirs. What is the nature of your skepticism? the performance enhancement is substantial, and there has been no complaint of a down side that I've seen... What's to be skeptical of? And, FWIW, I think mutt needs my pgp-auto-decode patch also. :) -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers.
Attachment:
pgpMafvAYp1F9.pgp
Description: PGP signature