Re: Mutt Next Generation
ok, I had a look.
This is a fork based on the mutt-1.5.6 vanilla code base plus some
patches. It does not include many of the changes made to the CVS
during the past year.
Missing bits include:
* The latest PGP/crypto integration code by g10 Code
* generic spam filtering
* send2-hook
* Some bug fixes that went into the CVS.
What "muttng" does include:
* nntp
* smtp
* header cache
* Florian Weimer's optimizations.
Personally, I don't think mutt should include either an NNTP or an
SMTP client (but maybe I'm old-fashioned). And I'm skeptic about
header-caching maildirs.
Comments would be welcome.
Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.
On 2005-01-26 11:37:58 +0100, Mads Martin Joergensen wrote:
> From: Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@xxxxxxx>
> To: mutt-dev@xxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:37:58 +0100
> Subject: Mutt Next Generation
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> Hey all,
>
> So what's the thoughts here about the new mutt-ng project?
>
> http://synflood.at/blog/archives/2005:01:09/forking-mutt
>
> and
>
> http://developer.berlios.de/projects/mutt-ng/
>
> --
> Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
> "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
> and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
> -- A. P. J.
>
>