On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 01:31:31AM EDT, David Champion wrote: > * On 2004.05.26, in <20040526211705.GA21771@xxxxxxx>, > * "Alain Bench" <veronatif@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Include dgc's excellent "unbind" patch. (This provides the most > > > intuitive UI (and many changes)) > > > > What does it do? Why was it rejected? > > http://home.uchicago.edu/~dgc/mutt/#unbind > > It implements "unbind x y" as an alternative to "bind x y noop", but > with the addition of allowing '*' as a wildcard for 'x' or for 'y'. > Likewise "unmacro". Now I remember why I didn't campaign for it back when it was posted. I should've looked back at the original thread discussion before making my last post :-( I'll volunteer to redo the patch to actually UNbind keys if I'm gonna have some running mates in the campaign for CVS :-) - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpuYFEnFChbN.pgp
Description: PGP signature