Alan,
I disagree.
In my opinion, ICANN has recourse at the Registrars level. If
the reseller is out of line, the Registrar that appointed them should be held
accountable.
I am not keen on creating further contracted parties at this level.
Adrian Kinderis
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 3:19 AM
To: Council GNSO'
Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two
houses approach
At 08/12/2008 10:32 AM, Philip Sheppard wrote:
Can
you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties
house (that is not a splinter group) ?
One that I would like to see, although it is not without some possible
conflicts, is registrar reseller constituency.
Just as a current registrar is bound by both a contacts with ICANN and with a
Registry, I would like to see resellers bound by a contract with ICANN and with
a Registrar. That would give ICANN direct recourse to deal with them, and make
them a contracted party.
Alan