RE: [council] Further Draft of GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report - for discussion

To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Further Draft of GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report - for discussion
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:44:01 +0100
In-reply-to: <C56199F6.49D2%robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07027CC366@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C56199F6.49D2%robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclWk5BsnF/k/i7bEEGW3gSB/yew2gALx/OAAHmZBNkAGfQPcA==

Rob,

I was horrified to read in the otherwise excellent raft the following:

"Determine form, structure and composition of implementation/transition oversight (drafting team, task force, working group, council subcommittee, etc)"

Who is seriously suggesting we need even more reform teams over and above the OSC and PSC steering groups and underlying teams ?

No No and thrice no.

Philip

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [council] Further Draft of GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report - for discussion
  - From: Robert Hoggarth
- [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
  - From: Philip Sheppard

References:
- RE: [council] For Discussion - Draft GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report
  - From: Gomes, Chuck
- [council] Further Draft of GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report - for discussion
  - From: Robert Hoggarth

Prev by Date: RE: [council] Travel support draft text
Next by Date: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
Previous by thread: [council] Further Draft of GNSO Council Restructure Implementation Report - for discussion
Next by thread: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread