<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach



Chuck, thanks for your first thoughts on this.
My concern about "GNSO flexibility" as you put it  is that the flexibility at present is 100% in the users house!
There is zero flexibility in the contract parties house.
 
In other words its contract parties (a fixed two constituency group)  and the rest of the world in the users house.
 
This fits poorly to the "birds of a feather" concept and the idea of new constituencies.
The relationships between users and the three types i mentioned are a direct parallel to the contract parties.
 
Can you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties house  (that is not a splinter group) ?
 
Philip