Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
Title: Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
Yes, sorry Adrian. I got your email just after sending mine and saw you were making the same point.
Stéphane
Le 08/12/08 21:29, « Adrian Kinderis » <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
Exactly my point Stéphane!
Adrian
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 7:26 AM
To: Alan Greenberg; Council GNSO'
Subject: Re: [council] GNSO Council Restructuring - a wrinkle in the two houses approach
Just a question: if resellers have a contract with ICANN, don’t they then become ICANN-accredited registrars?
Thanks.
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
+33 1 48 01 86 17
INDOM – Noms de domaine / Domain names
124-126, rue de Provence
75008 Paris. France
0820 77 7000
(Prix d'un appel local)
De l'étranger (calling from outside France): + 33 1 76 70 05 67
http://www.indom.com/
Daily domain name industry news: http://www.domaines.info/
Mon blog/My blog : http://www.domaines.info/
Le 08/12/08 17:19, « Alan Greenberg » <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
At 08/12/2008 10:32 AM, Philip Sheppard wrote:
Can you provide an example of a new constituency for the contract parties house (that is not a splinter group) ?
One that I would like to see, although it is not without some possible conflicts, is registrar reseller constituency.
Just as a current registrar is bound by both a contacts with ICANN and with a Registry, I would like to see resellers bound by a contract with ICANN and with a Registrar. That would give ICANN direct recourse to deal with them, and make them a contracted party.
Alan