Re: Mutt marking read spam as unread before saving (bogofilter)
On 2006-04-07, Derek Martin <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:45:49PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2006-04-07, Carthik Sharma <carthik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 4/6/06, Carthik Sharma <carthik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > I use some bogofilter macros to help re-categorize mail as spam or ham
> > > > when miscategorized.
> > > >
> > > > The problem is that the messages I open to read in, say my Inbox, and
> > > > then mark as spam with, Shift+S end up in the .spam mailbox as
> > > > expected, but marked as NEW. Is there a way I can prevent this from
> > > > happening. I include the macros below.
> > >
> > > Did I leave something out? Can I provide more info? Please ask if that
> > > is the case. Again, the problem is how to prevent Mutt from marking
> > > read messages as Unread before saving after refiltering through
> > > bogofilter.
> >
> > My first thought is: why do you care?
>
> [...]
>
> So, I was surprised when I saw this message all neatly formatted,
> since when I get mail from people at gmail, it ends up a nearly
> unintelligible mess, like this:
[...]
> So my question is, did it actually come out all jumbled for you and
> you cleaned it up? Or, did you just edit the quoted message yourself,
> to make it more readable? I often get mail from people at gmail, so
> if it's my configuration that's broken, I'd really like to fix it...
It was neatly formatted when I received it from Carthik. I do often
reformat messages to make them more readable in my replies, but I
did not do so in this case.
Regards,
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
garyjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Wireless Division
http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ | Spokane, Washington, USA