begin quotation of C Hamel on 2004-11-17 10:25:52 -0600: > I am puzzled that the consensus seems to be that inline is outdated > ...yet KDE uses it in its latest kmail client. You should take that up with the KDE developers. Or, you could take it up with Google - a HOWTO is the fourth result for "kmail gpg mime". > Further, though I have successfully encrypted via mutt (1)I cannot > read the result except via kmail; (2)no copy encrypted to me is sent > to sent-mail unless I am the recipient. What gives? How can this > be fixed? I don't seem to find any help regarding the command > structure. Mutt won't recognize inline encryption - besides kmail, the only other popular mail client I know of that will is Thunderbird (with Enigmail). I think you'll find that if you manually run gpg on the encrypted text that is 'only readable by kmail' you'll indeed be able to read it. > I have found absolutely nothing for use in .procmailrc in my searches except > as regards the PGO rather than GnuPG encryption. When I consulted the almighty oracle of Google for the string "procmailrc gpg mime", a recipie for converting to PGP/MIME was the fifth result. It's the one I was referring to in my previous mail. You ought to read up on the differences and similarities between PGP and GPG.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature