Re: Kyle Wheeler in <20041012003534.GA9125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > What about "send-hook ~l 'unset record'"? > > Unless I'm wrong (and hey, if I am, great!), that goes a little too far, > because it unsets the record in general, requiring a "send-hook . > record=blah" kind of command, where I'm unsure how it interacts with > other fcc- and fcc-save-hooks. What is the precedence of that sort of > thing? Uhm, that should have been 'unset copy'... (And as Patrick pointed out, you'll need a default send-hook to reset it for other messages.) Christoph -- cb@xxxxxxxx | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature