Hi,
* Nicolas Rachinsky wrote (2004-08-08 17:19):
>* Thorsten Haude <mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2004-08-08 12:28 +0200]:
>> I tried with both
>> set alternates=(yoo@vranx\.de|yooden@vranx\.de|.+@thorstenhau\.de)
>> Result: alternates="(yoo@xxxxxxxx|yooden@xxxxxxxx|.+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)"
>> and
>> set alternates=(yoo@vranx\\.de|yooden@vranx\\.de|.+@thorstenhau\\.de)
>> Result: alternates="(yoo@vranx\.de|yooden@vranx\.de|.+@thorstenhau\.de)"
>
>You can see in the index if it works. Just look for +, F and so on.
True. Seems to work.
>> but the behaviour does not change, I do not get the reversed address,
>> but the one from my default hook:
>> send-hook . 'my_hdr From: yooden@xxxxxxxx'
>
>I think this hook will overwrite it. Why do you need it?
I have a bunch of other send-hooks similar to this:
send-hook '~t mutt-users@xxxxxxxx' 'my_hdr From: mutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
The intention should be clear. If there is another way to achieve it
without munging reverse_name, I'd be glad to hear it.
>> If the hook causes this, how could I use different sender for
>> different mailing lists and reverse_name in my inbox?
>
>That depends on your setup. I add and remove send-hooks with
>folder-hooks.
I don't understand. How does that work? Once a send-hook has fired, it
shouldn't matter whether it is removed.
Thorsten
--
It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.
- Albert Einstein
Attachment:
pgpyB33NyarSU.pgp
Description: PGP signature