On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 06:49:55AM EST, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Feb 21 at 19:34, David Yitzchak Cohen spoke: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:28:36PM EST, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > > system. But I have installed 1.5.6i on one system now. > > > > The default version is often not a very good choice. Mutt isn't the > > only example, but it's one of the most interesting ones I've come across. > > I'm not looking for the 'best' version, just for one which supports > specific features (such as reply-hook). > > > > > Well, one of those extra features (added little bonus, eh?) is the > > > > reply-hook. I wish I could point you to an online version of the > > > > manual in plain text or HTML, but since no such thing exists AFAIK, the > > > > best I can manage is to provide you with a link to the SGML manual [1] > > > > of mine [2]. (I guess a pager like w3m or less is probably your best > > > > bet for reading the thing. I use w3m, FWIW.) > > > > Whoops ... sorry for forgetting to wrap that one :-( > > I thought you are using Outlook 1.5.6i? :-) > My .vimrc contains: > autocmd BufRead mutt-* source ~/.vimmail > and the ~/.vimmail contains: > set textwidth=68 $ cat ~/.exrc " Get that nifty effect where prototypes are automatically shown: set smartargs " Estos son m�s naturales que teclando "^K?~" o "^K!~": digraph ?? ¿ digraph !! ¡ " Elvis doesn't expand capitalized versions por defecto: abbr pq why abbr Pq Why As you can tell, I'm a configuration minimalist (although elvis also supports autowrapping). Don't worry, though: I'm working on an editor script for Mutt that'll take care of long lines, forgotten URLs, forgotten attachments, etc. > > > Ok. I have entered a reply-hook: > > > > > > reply-hook '~C hampi@xxxxxxxxxxxx' \ > > > 'my_hdr From: Hanspeter Roth <hampi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; \ > > > color status magenta yellow' > > > > > > Just it doesn't work as expected. > > > The default my_hdr From: gets applied. > > > Is there a certain sequence required? > > > > Do you have send-hooks or reply-hooks at some point after that one? > > No. Hmm :-( > > If you're not sure, just post your RC file here in its entirety, and > > somebody will probably pick through it to find the problem. > > Ok. I append a somewhat stripped version which behaves the same as > of the reply-hooks. No, you don't ;-P ...although you realized your mistake before I did, so no fun :-( > It seems that the send-hook '~t .' takes effect. I'll reply to the other mail in a sec ;-) - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpXxXdIG3QJZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature