Re: set sendmail, a bit dangerous?
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:05:40PM +0100, Michael Tatge wrote:
> * On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 Chris Green (chris@xxxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> > I had 'set sendmail=/proj/sbin/ssmtp' when it should have been 'set
> > sendmail=/proj/chris/sbin/ssmtp'. Not surprosingly it didn't work
> > very well, but couldn't mutt at least have produced an error if the
> > sendmil you gave it didn't exist?
>
> What's wrong with
> "Error sending message, child exited 127 (Exec error.)."?
>
Nothing at all except that I didn't see that (or anything), however I
realise there may be another reason and am investigating further.
I'll likely come back with more questions in due course.
--
Chris Green (chris@xxxxxxxxxxx)