Re: set sendmail, a bit dangerous?

To: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: set sendmail, a bit dangerous?
From: Michael Tatge <Michael.Tatge@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:05:40 +0100
In-reply-to: <20040202145709.GA6314@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-users-request@mutt.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
References: <20040202145709.GA6314@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-mutt-users@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i

* On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 Chris Green (chris@xxxxxxxxxxx) muttered:
> I had 'set sendmail=/proj/sbin/ssmtp' when it should have been 'set
> sendmail=/proj/chris/sbin/ssmtp'. Not surprosingly it didn't work
> very well, but couldn't mutt at least have produced an error if the
> sendmil you gave it didn't exist?

What's wrong with
"Error sending message, child exited 127 (Exec error.)."?

Michael
-- 
Work continues in this area.
                -- DEC's SPR-Answering-Automaton

PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key

Follow-Ups:
- Re: set sendmail, a bit dangerous?
  - From: Chris Green

References:
- set sendmail, a bit dangerous?
  - From: Chris Green

Prev by Date: [Solved] Re: Display of the '%Z' variable in 'index_format' and 'attribution'
Next by Date: Re: set sendmail, a bit dangerous?
Previous by thread: set sendmail, a bit dangerous?
Next by thread: Re: set sendmail, a bit dangerous?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread