Re: Payal Rathod in <20040116150400.GA25764@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > But it is .* i.e match _zero_ or mor einstances of ".", right? Right, I read "\.*" either as "\." or ".*", can't exactly remember. Re: Payal Rathod in <20040118163329.GA4668@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > @(blah.com|goo\.org) > > @((blah|goo)\.com) > > @((.+\.)?(blah|goo)\.com) > > Great. Seem so easy to look at. With the latter two, the outer () are again redundant. But it's a matter of taste which version you find more readable. > > I don't think anybody actually understood your original problem ;^) > > Well, the original problem was that with my a list with Reply-To set, > the "alternates" is of no use. It works with all lists except those > lists with Reply-To set. Can someone explain this? alternates (in the context of %F in the index) is working for me with Reply-To lists. It properly shows "To listname". Maybe you specified the wrong list name with "lists"/"subscribe"? Is the Reply-To different from the address you posted to? (I guess Mutt only looks at the To header, not Reply-To.) Christoph -- Christoph Berg <cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, http://www.df7cb.de/ Wohnheim D, 2405, Universität des Saarlandes, 0681/9657944
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature