On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:13:22PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, David Yitzchak Cohen wrote: > > > > Well, that's no fair. I was hoping for some sort of fossilized version > > > > of BSD's original VI :-( > > > > > > well, that's available - except that the original vi wouldn't compile on > > > anything recent, and the people who are interested in that have of course > > > made some fixes to get it to run, as well as update it. > > > > ...and where might their work be available? > > http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Applications/Ritter_Vi/ No kidding ... that's rather cool :-) Here's another interesting tidbit I learned there: there is no such thing as the original AT&T VI. The original VI was developed at UCB. In other words, AT&T's version had to have come later. That throws a monkeywrench into the whole discussion we were having before ... hmm ... I guess I have no choice but to compile this one and see how it behaves. . . Thanks again, - Dave -- Uncle Cosmo, why do they call this a word processor? It's simple, Skyler. You've seen what food processors do to food, right? Please visit this link: http://rotter.net/israel
Attachment:
pgpqzdf8pUgkP.pgp
Description: PGP signature