Re: pop-last=yes isn't working?
Hi,
* Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Sunday, April 19 at 04:25 PM, quoth Rocco Rutte:
> > Remembering which messages are really new is basically easy to solve
> > except one thing: mutt already supports two very different types of
> > optional caches. I don't know whether it makes sense to add yet
> > another one just to cache UIDLs for <fetch-mail> that is rarely
> > used.
> The one dissenting point I would make is that mutt does not make it
> easy to view the contents of its message cache (i.e. for offline email
> access or reference). I wish it did.
Header or body cache? All 4 hcache libs seem to support cursors, so that
should be doable if there's agreement on the UI. For body cache, the
folders are named after their URLs so it's usable as a read-only Maildir
when symlinked properly.
Rocco