<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: OT: offending sig + headers



On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:56:23PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote:
> I'm not sure what gave you that impression.  I assure you, I'm not
> interested.  People provide them anyway.  No offense at all meant
> (sincerely)... it's just that I've already thought this through in a
> lot of detail, and I'm very well aware of the alternative solutions,
> and I find them all unacceptable.  I'm a system administrator by
> training and trade, so managing mail and spam is a part of what I do;
> I have no choice but to stay reasonably up-to-date on related
> technologies.  So others' opinions, while possibly interesting from a
> philosophical perspective, are not something I'm particularly "very
> interested in receiving..." I'm pretty well-versed in the capabilities
> of the alternatives, and the pros and cons of each.  I remain
> convinced that my method is technically superior to everything else,
> even if a few people on mailing lists I'm interested in participating
> in find it unpleasant.

Wow. I mean, wow.

You're missing another alternative. Just don't post.

-- 
Darrin Chandler            |  Phoenix BSD User Group  |  MetaBUG
dwchandler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   |  http://phxbug.org/      |  http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/  |  Daemons in the Desert   |  Global BUG Federation