<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: OT: offending sig + headers



On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:09:36PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> You're probably aware of greylisting already. 

indeed.

> The reason I bring it up is that it's a spam fighting technique that
> doesn't make suspected spam disappear, but disallows delivery. So a
> false positive means someone gets a bounce, which alerts them to the
> problem.

Which is highly annoying for people who legitimately want to send you
mail, but aren't already whitelisted.  I personally hate it, and
refuse to subject people I know to such irritation.

> For your current setup, you might consider adding a reply-to header
> pointing at the list so that mails don't go to the bogus address by
> default for humans. 

You will note that such reply-to already exists, and has for a rather
long time...  :)


-- 
Derek D. Martin    http://www.pizzashack.org/   GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02
-=-=-=-=-
This message is posted from an invalid address.  Replying to it will result in
undeliverable mail.  Sorry for the inconvenience.  Thank the spammers.

Attachment: pgpcUd2bVp6FD.pgp
Description: PGP signature