* Mads Laursen <dossen+mutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2004:09:29:21:23:59+0200] scribed: > On 29/09/04 13.43, Michael D Schleif wrote: > > I belong to several lists, for which I use special my_hdr, realname & > > signature settings. Often, on these lists, I respond directly to the > > list member, and not on the list. <snip /> > If you want to set the same options with both folder- and send-hooks > you need to use the folder-hooks to change the send-hooks, since they > will otherwise override the folder-hooks. > > folder-hook . 'send-hook . xyz' > folder-hook =list 'send-hook . zyx' > > That way the setting is always made by a send-hook, but the send-hook > depends on the folder. <snip /> So, as I suspect, there is some precedent issue ;> Currently, no matter where I am, regardless in which folder I happen to be, my send-hook's work as I expect. I have not found a way to achieve my off-list reply goals via send-hook. Am I correct that this is not going to happen? If I understand your suggestion, I must use folder-hook to call *ALL* of my send-hook's? If so, then I must change my other behaviour, because my send-hook's will no longer work, unless I am in the proper holder. Right? I find it reasonable to require presence in a specific folder when replying to a message, regardless ON or OFF list. However, I am not comfortable with requiring presence in a specific folder, just to fire off any original message. Is there no other way to achieve my goals? What do you think? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature