<<< Date Index >>>     <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: save-hooks and mailinglists



On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 12:22:30PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Aron --
> 
> BTW, is there any reason all of your lines are padded out to 80 chars?
> Did you perhaps copy one message into another?
> 

Yea, sorry about that, after I realized I sent my reply to your personal
address and not to the list, I copied it from a 80 column wide terminal
and re-sent it to the list, my mistake.

> ...and then Aron Stansvik said...
> % 
> % On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
> % > * Aron Stansvik <elvstone@xxxxxxx> [29-10-2003 16:29]:
> % > 
> % > > Isn't this a feature that might be interesting? The ability to save
> ...
> % > appropriate boxes?  This seems like a job for procmail and the like.
> %
> % Yes, I think that's how I want it. I guess this is a feature for those
> % of us who don't subscribe to huge amounts of mailing lists and who like
> 
> Well, while I do subscribe to many, I don't think it's only for those
> that do.  I even like to read all of my mail, though I haven't truly been
> able to for a while now.
> 

Ok.

> 
> % mailbox when I start reading my mail? Or any other means than save-hooks
> % to get this behaviour?
> 
> Not that comes to mind.  Well, not practical, anyway; if you save a
> single message it will go where the hook tells it to, so you could have a
> default hook to ensure that uncategorized mail does not get lost (maybe
> save it in ! or maybe save it in =justaminute and then reload all of
> that) and then just save-return-save-return-save-return your way down the
> list (no doubt by macro).  And if you don't get much mail and aren't on
> many lists and such you may only have one or two dozen mails to handle
> like that and so it isn't completely insane.
> 

I guess not, I'll figure something out, or get myself a decent sorter
instead.

> % How do people usually manage their mailing lists when only using Mutt
> 
> One probably has a spool file, an mbox file for old stuff, and a sent
> file for what has been sent.  Maybe, just maybe, folders for each
> correspondent (save_name).
> 
> If you want your mail sorted, then you need a sorter, and mutt simply
> doesn't try to be a sorter.
> 

No, I guess not. I'll look into procmail, maybe it's not so much of a
science as I think it is.

> 
> % (no procmail)? I know I should learn procmail, but if this could be done
> % in Mutt, I would be more than happy, since I think procmail is somewhat
> % overkill for me :)
> 
> So learn maildrop or any other delivery agent :-)  There are plenty of
> them out there.
> 

Roger roger.

> % --
> % unemployed
> 
> Hey, you should have plenty of time to learn procmail, then ;-)  [But my
> heart bleeds for you as I'm in the same boat.]

Sucks, don't it? :)

Thanks for your elaborate answers anyway.

Sincerely,
Aron Stansvik

--
unemployed

Attachment: pgpOZnNgLJSQy.pgp
Description: PGP signature